Book strategy call → Client Dashboard →
Book strategy call
Home / Case studies / Parker Heating and Cooling
Client Parker Heating and Cooling
Industry HVAC · Family-owned
Engagement PPC overhaul · 24 months
Case № 024 · 2023 / 2024

Returned $18 for every $1 Parker spent — by rebuilding their PPC from scratch.

A family-owned HVAC business cut lead costs from $83 to $15, scaled to 125+ leads per month, and achieved an 18× return on ad spend after Redefine Web restructured their Google Ads, built service-specific landing pages, and tightened keyword targeting.

Result $18 returned per $1 spent (— ROAS), $15 average CPL, and 125+ qualified leads per month.
Approach Restructured ad account, conversion tracking, service-specific landing pages, and seasonal scaling around heatwaves.
Services
Paid Ads Strategy Google Ads Optimization Landing Page Development Lead Generation
Stack Google Ads · WordPress landing pages
// parker-heating-and-cooling.live
ROAS
18×
↗ vs prior 1×
Cost per lead
$15
↘ from $83
Monthly leads
125+
↗ steady
Cost per lead · 24-month curve
-82%
About the client

A family-owned HVAC company with strong service and referrals — built for trust, not for ad-spend optimization.

Parker Heating and Cooling, a family-owned HVAC company, struggled to scale in a digital-first, seasonal market despite strong service and referrals. Their self-managed Google Ads lacked structure, targeting, and tracking, resulting in costly leads and poor ROI.

Partnering with Redefine Web, they adopted a performance-driven digital strategy focused on pay-per-click ads, hyper-specific ad groups, and dedicated landing pages — turning digital into a core revenue driver supporting expansion.

i The challenge

Big budget, broad campaigns, $80+ leads, no tracking.

Parker's Google Ads account was disorganized, using broad campaigns like "HVAC" or "AC" that drove irrelevant clicks and higher costs. Quality scores were low, CPCs were inflated, and no conversion tracking was in place — making it impossible to measure real customer acquisition.

Traffic was sent to the homepage instead of service-specific landing pages. This mismatch lowered conversion rates and led to paying over $80 per lead while struggling to secure profitable new customers.

Seasonality made things worse. Campaigns weren't built to scale during summer demand spikes, missing valuable opportunities.

Pre-engagement baseline Month 0
CPL $83
Leads/mo <25
Tracking —
ii The solutions

Restructure, segment, track — and let the high-margin work do the talking.

We implemented a structured PPC-led inbound system designed to maximize ROI and scale high-quality leads. The approach included restructuring Parker's ad account, applying conversion tracking, creating tightly aligned ad groups, and building conversion-focused landing pages.

Seasonal strategies, targeted keywords, and ad copy refinement ensured leads were profitable and aligned to the client's high-margin installation services.

  1. Service-specific landing pages
    AC repair, furnace install, maintenance — each with copy and CTAs aligned to the search query.
  2. Targeted keyword + negative lists
    Negative keywords stopped wasted clicks; tight match types focused budget on intent.
  3. End-to-end conversion tracking
    Phone calls and form fills both attributed so every lead tied back to the ad group.
  4. Territory + unit-type segmentation
    Campaign structure that matched dispatch reality so ads only ran where Parker could service.
  5. Heatwave seasonal scaling
    Pre-built scaling plays that flexed budget upward fast during demand spikes.
Services used
Paid Ads Strategy Google Ads Optimization Landing Page Development Lead Generation

Strength in numbers.

Lead quality went up, costs dropped, and ROI became measurable. By focusing budgets on high-profit installation services, ROI reached 18× — enabling sustainable growth and fleet expansion.

01 · Return on ad spend ↗
18×
Achieved $18 profit for every $1 invested in PPC campaigns.
02 · Qualified leads ↗
125+
Generated over 125 qualified leads per month under $15 each.
03 · Cost per lead ↘
-82%
Reduced lead cost from $83 to $15 — an 82% improvement on acquisition.
↗ Headline result · $18 returned per $1 spent
Reporting cadence · weekly · install-margin tied